Giles Hussey vs Blake Mott Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W L
Form
W L L W W W L W W LHead To Head: Hussey 1 - 1 Mott
They have played 6 sets in total, with Hussey winning 3 and Mott winning 3. The last match between Hussey and Mott was at the M25 Sunderland, 22-01-2025, First, I.hard with Giles Hussey getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Giles Hussey | 1 |
| Blake Mott | 1 |
M25 Sunderland(22-01-2025)
6
3
3
6
6
3
| Hussey | Stats | Mott |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (12-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (9-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 445 | Ranking | 477 |
| 304 | Highest Rank | 220 |
| 27 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 5 |
| 63% (165-97) | Career Total W/L | 57% (253-189) |
| $12,990 | Career Prize Money | $133,500 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Bonzi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Giles Hussey
Player
Blake Mott
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Giles Hussey
87%
(
67 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 26 | Games Won | 27 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:12:56 | Average Match Time | 2:12:56 |
| 68% (117/173) | 1st Serve % | 81% (128/159) |
| 67% (78/117) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (90/128) |
| 50% (28/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (13/31) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (6/15) |
| 35% (56/159) | Return Points Win % | 39% (67/173) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Giles Hussey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Giles Hussey
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
36 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Toby Samuel
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Giles Hussey
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
82%
(
18 of
22)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Philip Henning
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
3
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
8
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Blake Mott
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Matisse Bobichon
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
73%
(
83 of
114)
1st Serve %
62%
(
88 of
141)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
12
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
88)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
62 of
141)
131
Total Points Won
124
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Blake Mott
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Mert Alkaya
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
6 of
11)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
20
Total Points Won
19
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Dinko Dinev
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Thando Longwe-Smit
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Blake Mott
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
40 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Blake Mott
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Dennis Novak
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (165/97) | Win/Loss | 57% (253/189) |
| 60% (365/248) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (566/438) |
| 54% (3111/2685) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4923/4425) |
| 67% (101/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (215/146) |
| 66% (23/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (26/26) |
| 62% (37/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (8/11) |
| 25% (4/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 721 | Aces Total | 925 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 614 | Total Double Faults | 1160 |
| 1:34:21 | Average Match Time | 1:13:4 |
| 490.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 538.29 |
| 62% (9744/15603) | 1st Serve % | 68% (14723/21659) |
| 67% (6547/9744) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (10060/14723) |
| 50% (2958/5859) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3344/6936) |
| 43% (743/1731) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1032/2338) |
| 41% (6630/16011) | Return Points Win % | 41% (9045/21837) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 46% (6/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (14/20) | Challenger W/L | 51% (68/66) |
| 67% (149/74) | Futures W/L | 62% (179/112) |
| 63% (161/257) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (250/434) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (34/73) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (61/111) |
| 59% (52/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (64/126) |
| 84% (158/133) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (254/220) |
| 16% (158/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (254/33) |
| 31% (104/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (188/34) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
